GG News Bureau
New Delhi, 7th Feb. It is stated that those who are ignorant of history will inevitably repeat it. However, since gaining our freedom, we have been told to forget the atrocities of the partition era. This way of thinking was also incorporated into the writing of history. We are now brave enough to declare that Veer Savarkar originated the doctrine of two nations. It is evident that Mohammad Ali Jinnah must be absolved of any responsibility for the division of Bharat. Lies are spread more painful than old wounds when the truth is kept hidden.
While Jinnah was secular, Vande Mataram was communal
There were the slogans used by those protesting the Citizenship Amendment Act, who received backing from the nation’s major opposition parties. Even the slogan “Bharat tere tukade honge, Insha Allah Insha Allah ” does not bother them. After 75 years, Jinnah became secular and the song Vande Mataram, which served as the impetus for the liberation fight, became communal. This is where the nation is now because of the politics of so-called secularism. It is reported that once Jinnah declared direct action on August 16, 1946, there were riots. Forget everything, including the number of people who died, the number of buildings demolished, and the number of women who were raped.
The greatest irony of the millennium
Forget about the twenty lakh persons who lost their lives during the division. Forget about the largest displacement of the century. The folks who slaughtered their own sisters and daughters in order to preserve their honor ought to put the entire affair behind them. The Hindu psyche had previously suffered from other wounds. The suffering has been transferred from one generation to the next for eight hundred years. The trauma of the division turned fresh.
The biggest hypocrisy of the century came about in an attempt to forget this catastrophe, the culture of the Ganga-Jamuni. Why was India split up if there was a true culture like that? Discover the times during which this Ganga-Jamuni culture was most prevalent by studying the complete historical record. The people who came up with this idea are unaware that Jamuna’s existence unites with Ganga during the Ganga-Jamuna confluence at Prayagraj. Naturally, this would not be what the supporters of this culture would like.
Muslim Bharat is in demand within Bharat
The book “India Divided” by Dr. Rajendra Prasad. He writes in this that Sir Mohammad Iqbal was the one who initially demanded a separate nation for Muslims in 1930. In December 1930, he made the following statement as President of the Muslim League conference in Allahabad: “The religious ideal of Islam is organically linked to the social system created by it.” If you reject one, you must also reject the other. Thus, it is inconceivable for any Muslim to consider engaging in national politics that contradicts the objective of Islamic unity. Instead of rejecting this Islamic principle, the Bharatiya state should strive for unity via mutual coordination and cooperation. “Sadly, our search for internal coordination has failed,” he continues. What caused this search to be unsuccessful? Because maybe we don’t trust each other’s motives. And they attempt to control one another from within. Thus, we have every right to seek the creation of a Muslim Bharat within Bharat.
Hindus have never used violence
In the four chapters of Sanskriti, national poet Ramdhari Singh Dinkar writes, ‘Hindus were born non-violent. It was not in their tradition to battle outside their boundaries.
The best defense is to attack the aggressor in his own home. Hindus never implemented this policy. The result was that they got into the habit of fighting defensive wars.’ Not only about eight hundred years of slavery under the Mughals and Muslim rulers, but also during the partition, Hindus suffered the consequences of this policy. Now it is being said that Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s announcement of celebrating ‘Partition Horrors Memorial Day’ will increase the animosity between the two communities. Old wounds will be green. There will be no loss or benefit from this. Those who say this probably either do not understand the problem of Hindu-Muslim relations or do not want to understand it. This issue does not start from the time of partition, if we forget what happened at that time then everything will be fine. Iranian scholar Al Biruni has written about this. According to him, ‘Hindus had seen many scenes of fighting and carnage. He had never imagined even in his dreams that there could be at least one caste in the world who would find happiness in breaking statues and desecrating temples. When the temples and idols suffered a disaster with the Muslim invasion, the hearts of the Hindus were torn and they became angry with Islam ever since then and are still angry
It will be necessary to disclose the complete truth
Thus, history cannot be concealed or forgotten. Such an attempt is invariably met with unfavorable outcomes. Truth has a nasty habit of always finding a way to surface. In that case, the public ought to be aware of the perpetrator of this significant historical disaster. It is not intended to exact retribution on someone for this reason. All tragedies must have their full truth spoken in order to find resolution. This is not the end, but the beginning. The Congress Party is adamant about maintaining its position that it gave the nation its independence. Yes, that is correct. This cannot be contested. So who exactly split up the nation, is the question.
Comments are closed.