Persistence of EVM allegations involving Ravindra Dattaram Waikar: A Case Study

Paromita Das

GG News Bureau

New Delhi, 19 June. Despite numerous clarifications from the Election Commission of India (ECI) that Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs) are standalone devices with no wireless connectivity, allegations of tampering and malfunction persist. The recent victory of Ravindra Dattaram Waikar from Eknath Shinde’s Shiv Sena in the Mumbai North West constituency during the 2024 Lok Sabha elections is a notable instance. Ravindra Dattaram Waikar won these elections by a slim margin of 48 votes.

The controversy that followed highlights the enduring scepticisms surrounding EVMs.

Allegations and Political Implications

The Mid-Day newspaper recently reported on a heated matter involving an event during the vote count on June 4. According to reports, a relative of Ravindra Waikar was seen using a mobile phone that was allegedly connected to an Electronic Voting Machine (EVM) at the counting center. This occurrence triggered an explosive discussion among political rivals, with the Congress party questioning the trustworthiness of EVMs. Critics claimed this incident indicated potential tampering, despite the ECI’s assurances and the inherent design of EVMs that prevent wireless connectivity.

Political Leaders’ Reactions

The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) reacted quickly to these claims, sharply denouncing opposition leaders for disseminating falsehoods. They encouraged the Election Commission of India to take legal proceedings against those considered responsible for propagating these claims, highlighting the need for responsibility and integrity in electoral discourse.

The Nature of EVMs and ECI’s Assurances

EVMs are designed to be standalone devices, which means they are not connected to any network, including the internet or any wireless systems. This design is intended to safeguard the machines from any form of hacking or remote tampering. The ECI has repeatedly affirmed the security and integrity of EVMs, emphasizing their robustness against unauthorized access and manipulation.

Factors Contributing to Persistent Allegations

1. Lack of Technical Understanding: Many allegations stem from a fundamental misunderstanding of how EVMs operate. The lack of widespread technical literacy regarding these machines’ design and functioning can lead to unfounded suspicions.
2. Mistrust in Authorities: A general mistrust in governmental institutions and processes can fuel scepticism. Historical instances of electoral fraud in various parts of the world contribute to this mistrust, making it easier for allegations to gain traction even when evidence is lacking.
3.  Political Motivations: Political parties and candidates who lose elections may find it advantageous to allege tampering or malfunction as a way to undermine the legitimacy of the victor and galvanize their supporter base. These allegations can be strategic, aiming to cast doubt on the electoral process rather than presenting substantive proof of misconduct.
4. Influence of Social Media: In the digital age, misinformation and conspiracy theories can spread rapidly on social media platforms. Allegations of EVM tampering, regardless of their veracity, can gain significant attention and be amplified by users, creating a widespread perception of potential electoral fraud.

The Importance of Transparency and Public Education

To address the recurrent allegations and restore public confidence in the electoral process, several measures can be undertaken:

1. Enhanced Public Education: The ECI and other relevant bodies should invest in comprehensive public education campaigns to explain the mechanics and security features of EVMs. Clear, accessible information can demystify the technology and alleviate unfounded fears.
2. Transparency Measures: Increasing the transparency of the electoral process can help. This includes allowing more extensive scrutiny by independent observers, providing detailed public reports on the functioning and testing of EVMs, and ensuring that all protocols are rigorously followed and publicly documented.
3. Swift and Decisive Action: Whenever allegations arise, prompt and thorough investigations should be conducted. The results of these investigations must be made public to demonstrate the commitment to electoral integrity and to dispel any unfounded rumors.

Background and Political Career of Waikar

Ravindra Waikar, a previous close colleague of Uddhav Thackeray, made a significant shift by joining Eknath Shinde’s Shiv Sena. His political career has been distinguished, as he has served as a three-time MLA for Jogeshwari East and held positions of power within the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation. His strategic adjustments within Maharashtra’s political landscape demonstrate his versatility and impact on regional government.

His political career has included key responsibilities as a minister in administrations led by both the BJP-Shiv Sena alliance and the Maharashtra Vikas Aghadi (MVA), demonstrating his strong influence and broad expertise in defining Maharashtra’s political environment. His service in these varied administrations highlights his adaptability and strategic aptitude in handling the intricacies of state governance and coalition dynamics.

Conclusion

The case of Ravindra Dattaram Waikar’s controversial victory in Mumbai North West underscores the ongoing challenges faced by electoral bodies in maintaining public trust in EVMs. The BJP’s quick reaction demonstrates their dedication to factual accuracy and government transparency. The BJP’s demand for responsibility from those disseminating misinformation shows its commitment to sustaining trust in democratic processes. As the political landscape changes, it is critical to prioritize evidence-based debate and maintain the legitimacy of electoral institutions for the sake of democratic values and public trust.

While the technical integrity of these machines is robust, overcoming the layers of mistrust and misinformation requires continuous effort in public education, transparency, and prompt action. Only through these measures can the cycle of allegations be broken, ensuring confidence in the democratic process.