Pakistan’s Same Old Rant: Proxy War Again

Paromita Das

New Delhi, 13th  November: The recent Red Fort blast in New Delhi and the suicide attack in Islamabad have once again thrown into sharp relief the entrenched proxy war waged by Pakistan against Bharat. While Pakistan predictably blames Bharat for these attacks, shifting the world’s gaze through its usual victimhood narrative, deeper questions emerge. Is this an act of revenge for Bharat’s decisive Operation Sindoor targeting terror infrastructure inside Pakistan? More intriguingly, is there involvement from external intelligence agencies like America’s CIA, worried about evolving geopolitical ties between Bharat and the Taliban-ruled Afghanistan? Could there be a mischievous syndicate orchestrating chaos to derail South Asian stability?

Pakistan’s Proxy War: A Chronicle of Shadow Conflict

Since Partition, Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) and military have consistently employed militant groups like Jaish-e-Mohammad (JeM), Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT), and the Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) as strategic instruments against Bharat’s interests. Their operations have targeted civilians and security forces, weaving terror into the fabric of regional politics. The recent Red Fort attack involved a well-entrenched Jaish module, with links traced to handlers in Pakistan, Afghanistan, and even Turkey, revealing a sophisticated transnational terror network.

Reaction to Operation Sindoor: A Turning Point and Possible Revenge?

Operation Sindoor, launched by Bharat in May 2025 following the Pahalgam terror attack, marked perhaps the most significant military strike on Pakistani terrorist infrastructure in decades. The coordinated missile and airstrikes crippled multiple terror camps in Pakistan and Pakistan-administered Kashmir, signaling Bharat’s assertive stance against cross-border terrorism. Could the Red Fort blast and subsequent violence be Pakistan’s retaliatory move against this Bharatiya military resolve? The timing suggests a calculated response to undermine Bharat’s messaging of strength and deterrence.

The CIA Connection: Fact or Conspiracy?

Adding layers to this complex chessboard of regional hostility is speculation about America’s Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) involvement. America’s anxiety over the deepening Bharat-Taliban diplomatic ties cannot be overlooked. Historically, the CIA has had a role in South Asian geopolitics, supporting various factions to safeguard its interests. Is it plausible that behind the veil of proxy terror lies a broader agenda by foreign powers to destabilize Bharat’s role in the region, particularly with Afghanistan aligning closer to New Delhi? No concrete evidence supports these claims yet, but the convergence of interests and regional shifts makes this question urgent and deserving of scrutiny.

Pakistan’s Victimhood: A Never-Ending Diversion

Despite the mounting proof of Pakistan’s hand in cross-border militancy, its officials—led by Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif and Defense Minister Khawaja Asif—continuously accuse Bharat of “state terrorism” and orchestrating proxy attacks from Afghanistan. This recurring victim card, devoid of substantive evidence, operates to evade accountability, rally nationalist support within Pakistan, and confuse the international narrative. It equally deflects attention from worsening Pakistan-Afghanistan relations, where Islamabad accuses Kabul of harboring foes—a denial consistently voiced by the Taliban regime.

Regional Dynamics and Diplomatic Realignments

The South Asian security ecosystem is in flux. Bharat’s strengthened ties with Taliban-led Afghanistan, amplified by diplomatic engagements and strategic collaboration, unsettle Pakistan’s traditional influence. Islamabad’s proxy war, thus, does not merely target Bharat but aims to disrupt emerging regional alignments favoring Bharat. Coupled with heightened tensions along the Pakistan-Afghanistan border, and the recent escalation of violence, these factors underscore a volatile mix that imperils long-term peace.

Demand for Transparency and Accountability

In this intricate play of terror, diplomacy, and international intrigue, poison spreads through misinformation and unverified conspiracies. While questions about American involvement warrant investigation, Pakistan’s staunch denial of its proxy militancy demands harsher scrutiny and genuine reform. Bharat’s steadfast response through military operations and diplomatic channels reflects a strategy focused on national security balanced with international norms.

Breaking the Cycle Requires Honesty

The Red Fort blast and Islamabad attacks symbolize the persistent shadow conflict that defines Bharat-Pakistan relations—one fueled by state-sponsored terror under the guise of victimhood. Speculations about foreign intelligence involvement underscore the complex geopolitical stakes but should not obscure the pressing need for Pakistan to genuinely dismantle terror networks. Bharat’s vigilance and regional partnerships are crucial to countering these threats and fostering lasting peace. Only through transparency, accountability, and regional dialogue can this historical proxy war find its closure.