An Indian man living in Taiwan recently shared a thought-provoking encounter with a friend that opened his eyes to how some Taiwanese view India’s historical and cultural complexities. After a year of living in Taiwan, the man noticed that, despite friendships he’d formed, many locals kept a personal distance. He finally broached the topic with a close friend, only to be taken aback by the candid response.
The Taiwanese friend questioned India’s history, pointing out how British rule over India relied heavily on cooperation from local forces rather than an overwhelming foreign presence. Referring to incidents like the 1919 Jallianwala Bagh massacre, he argued that Indian soldiers, rather than British forces alone, had followed orders that resulted in the loss of many Indian lives.
The conversation then turned to the Mughal era, with the friend noting that, despite limited numbers, Mughals held power for centuries. “Why didn’t Indian forces resist, rather than join foreign ranks?” he asked, attributing a readiness to align with invaders as one factor that facilitated outside rule. According to him, this pattern of aligning with foreign powers for personal gain has left a lasting impression on how some in Taiwan view Indian society. He added that, by contrast, during British rule in Hong Kong, locals reportedly refused to join British ranks.
For the Indian man, the discussion served as a mirror, reflecting a perspective he hadn’t anticipated. His friend suggested that, while individuals often prioritize family and personal interests, this can occasionally overshadow national interests in a way that leaves a lasting impression globally. The conversation concluded on a contemplative note, with both men reflecting on how historical dynamics continue to shape cultural perceptions across borders.
Comments are closed.