Rethinking Work-Life Balance: A Needonomics Perspective on 90-Hour Work Week

By Prof. M.M. Goel, Former Vice-Chancellor

The recent statement by Mr. S.N. Subramaniam, CEO of L&T, advocating for a 90-hour work week as a pathway to a “Developed India” has sparked widespread debate. While the intent may be to emphasize hard work and dedication, the suggestion raises critical concerns about work-life balance, mental well-being, and sustainable productivity. This discourse must be viewed through the lens of the Needonomics School of Thought, which prioritizes efficiency and well-being over sheer work hours.

Significance of Work-Life Balance
Work-life balance is not merely a personal choice; it is a cornerstone of mental health and societal well-being. Extensive research highlights the strong correlation between balanced work schedules and higher productivity levels. Employees who maintain a healthy work-life equilibrium are more motivated, focused, and innovative, thereby contributing significantly to organizational and national growth. A 90-hour work week disrupts this balance, leading to burnout, health issues, and diminished efficiency—a counterproductive outcome.

Productivity Through Efficiency, Not Prolonged Hours
Needonomics School of Thought firmly advocates for enhancing productivity through efficiency rather than extending work hours. A compelling example of this is the productivity boost observed when work hours are shifted to early mornings, such as between 3 AM and 6 AM. Such schedules harness peak mental clarity and energy levels, showcasing the importance of optimizing work environments and routines rather than overstretching them.

The focus should not be on how long one works but on how effectively time and resources are utilized. Countries with shorter average workweeks, such as those in Scandinavia, consistently rank higher in productivity and employee satisfaction, illustrating the value of efficiency-driven approaches.

Ethical and Cultural Concerns
Mr. Subramaniam’s additional remark, “how long can you stare at your wife,” further detracts from the discussion by undermining the importance of family relationships and respect. This statement not only trivializes the value of personal time but also perpetuates a disrespectful and unethical narrative. Healthy relationships, both at home and work, are integral to creating a supportive environment for individuals to thrive.

Rethinking Development and Progress
Development is not merely about GDP growth or industrial output; it is about creating a society that values and supports its citizens towards happiness and health. Stretching the workweek to 90 hours is a short-sighted approach that overlooks the long-term implications on mental health, family life, and societal harmony. True progress lies in fostering a culture where productivity is derived from innovation, efficiency, and well-being, aligning with the principles of Needonomics.

Conclusion
The discourse on work hours must evolve to reflect the realities of the modern workplace and the needs of individuals. Rather than advocating for unsustainable workweeks, leaders should focus on fostering efficiency, technological integration, and a supportive work culture. Needonomics School of Thought reminds us that sustainable productivity stems not from overextension but from balance, respect, and optimized efficiency.

India’s journey toward becoming a developed nation must prioritize the well-being of its people, for a nation thrives when its citizens do. It is high time to rethink our approaches to work and productivity, ensuring that they align with ethical, efficient, and sustainable principles.

Comments are closed.