Bharat at a Crossroads: Political Unrest, National Security, and the Battle for Unity

Kumar Rakesh
New Delhi, 10th Feb. Bharat, the world’s largest democracy, is facing a series of challenges that are reshaping its political and social landscape. From violent assaults on public officials to ideological battles over nationalism and security, the nation finds itself at a critical juncture. The resurgence of separatist movements, communal tensions, and debates over governance have intensified divisions, testing the resilience of its democratic institutions. As protests erupt, security concerns rise, and political clashes dominate headlines, the need for dialogue, accountability, and reform has never been more urgent. Amidst these turbulent times, Bharat must navigate a path that upholds its core values of unity, justice, and democratic integrity.

Alleged Assault on Delhi’s Chief Secretary

In February 2018, a significant controversy emerged when Delhi’s Chief Secretary, Anshu Prakash, alleged that he was assaulted during a meeting at then Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal’s residence. The meeting, held at midnight, was reportedly convened to discuss issues related to the distribution of ration to citizens. Prakash claimed that he was physically attacked by two Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) MLAs in the presence of Kejriwal and Deputy Chief Minister Manish Sisodia. This incident led to widespread condemnation and highlighted the strained relationship between the elected government and the bureaucratic machinery in Delhi.

The legal proceedings that followed saw various developments. In October 2018, Kejriwal, Sisodia, and 11 other AAP legislators were granted bail by the Patiala House Court. The court proceedings continued over the years, with the former Chief Secretary labeling Kejriwal and Sisodia as the “kingpins” of the conspiracy. However, in August 2021, a Delhi court discharged Kejriwal, Sisodia, and others in the case, citing insufficient evidence to proceed to trial. This decision was upheld in subsequent appeals, bringing a controversial end to the high-profile case.

Support for Khalistan Movement

The resurgence of support for the Khalistan movement, advocating for a separate Sikh homeland, has raised alarms. Events like the Khalistan Referendum in Calgary, Canada, which honored individuals designated as terrorists, have internationalized the issue. The Bharatiya government has expressed concerns over foreign entities supporting separatist movements, viewing them as threats to national unity and security.

Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) Protests and Riots

The enactment of the Citizenship Amendment Act led to widespread protests across the country, culminating in the 2020 Delhi riots. The violence resulted in significant loss of life and property, exposing deep-seated communal tensions. Critiques have been directed at the Delhi Police for their handling of the situation, with allegations of inaction and complicity. The riots underscored the challenges in balancing legislative actions with societal harmony.

Murder of Ankit Sharma

Ankit Sharma, an Intelligence Bureau officer, was tragically killed during the Delhi riots. His death became emblematic of the chaos and brutality of the period. Investigations led to arrests, but the incident highlighted the perils faced by security personnel during civil unrest and the need for robust protective measures.

Opposition to the Indian Army

Segments of society have voiced opposition to the Indian Army’s actions in certain regions, leading to a polarized discourse on national security and human rights. While some criticize alleged excesses, others emphasize the army’s role in maintaining sovereignty and internal stability. This dichotomy reflects the broader debate on the balance between security and civil liberties.

Support for ‘Tukde Tukde’ Gang

The term ‘Tukde Tukde’ gang has been used to describe groups perceived as advocating for the fragmentation of Bharat. Support for such entities has been a contentious issue, with accusations of sedition leveled against activists and students. This has sparked debates on freedom of expression and the limits of dissent in a democratic society.

Settlement of Rohingya Refugees in Delhi

The issue of Rohingya refugees has been a contentious topic in Bharat, particularly concerning their settlement in the national capital. The Rohingya, a predominantly Muslim ethnic group from Myanmar, have fled persecution and sought refuge in various countries, including Bharat. Estimates suggest that around 40,000 Rohingya reside in Bharat, with significant populations in Jammu, Hyderabad, and Delhi.

In recent times, the presence of Rohingya refugees in Delhi has become a focal point of political debate. The Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) and the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) have exchanged accusations over the settlement and support of these refugees. AAP leaders have alleged that the central government facilitated the settlement of Rohingyas in Delhi, while BJP leaders have countered that the AAP government provided them with amenities and support.

The legal status of Rohingya refugees in Bharat remains precarious. Bharat is not a signatory to the 1951 UN Refugee Convention, and as such, Rohingyas are often classified as illegal immigrants. This classification has led to challenges in accessing basic services. In February 2025, the Supreme Court of India was set to hear a plea from an NGO seeking directions to grant Rohingya refugees access to public schools and hospitals. The plea highlighted that many refugees were denied these services due to the lack of Aadhaar cards, despite possessing UNHCR identification.

The incidents discussed above underscore the complex interplay between politics, governance, and human rights in Bharat. The alleged assault on the Chief Secretary highlighted the tensions that can arise between elected representatives and bureaucrats, emphasizing the need for clear protocols and mutual respect to ensure effective governance. On the other hand, the situation of Rohingya refugees brings to the fore the challenges of balancing national security concerns with humanitarian obligations. While it is essential to ensure the country’s security, it is equally important to uphold the principles of compassion and provide basic human rights to those seeking refuge.

Conclusion

Bharat’s journey as a diverse and democratic nation is fraught with challenges that test its institutional frameworks and societal values. The incidents of the alleged assault on the Chief Secretary and the debates over Rohingya settlements are reflective of broader issues that require nuanced and balanced approaches. It is imperative for all stakeholders, including the government, judiciary, civil society, and citizens, to engage in constructive dialogue, uphold the rule of law, and foster an environment that respects human rights and democratic principles. Only through such collective efforts can Bharat navigate its complexities and continue on its path of progress and inclusivity.